This looks bad for both Clinton and Trump to be honest.
With March for Life going on in several
locations across the United States in memorial of 43 years of legal
killing of children, the unpleasant topic of abortion should be
addressed. It's also an election year in the US and these two issues
intersect in ways that cannot be ignored. On the right the choice
Americans will likely have is Donald Trump, who said he was
pro-choice before doing a complete 180 and declaring himself pro-lifeduring the 2012 primary cycle.
Call me cynical but I fully believe that he declared himself pro-life
to score points with evangelical protestants. It didn't work for him
in 2012 but it seems to have made a difference for him in 2016.
On the Left the Democrats are likely to
choose Hilary Clinton despite the weird meme being promoted that
Bernie Sanders has anything but a remote chance of getting thenomination .
Clinton proudly touts her feminism and has made the idiotic error of
being public seen with confirmed pedophile Lena Dunham in order to
tout her feminist credentials.
Little needs to be said about Clinton's stance on the continuation of
the policy that has allowed nearly 59,000,000 babies to be killed by
their mothers and hired killers with medical credentials. Clinton
would promote the status quo on this issue and on many others not
relevant to the discussion at hand.
The choice will likely be between a
potential liar in Trump and the status quo in Clinton. How does one
proceed? I'm a registered non-affiliated voter in my state, at least
for the time being. There are plenty of Catholic voices out there
telling me I have a moral duty to vote Republican, which is on its
face as absurd as the concept of a pro-choice Catholic. Do I trust a
potential liar, vote for the status quo (taking Trump's other issues
into context) or vote for a third party candidate?
Let's take the issue a step further. At
the national level the GOP has little to no credibility on the
abortion issue due to their having controlling Congress, the Supreme
Court, and the White House from 2001-2007 and took no major initiative on
abortion. Recently Speaker Ryan took defunding Planned Parenthood off
the table as a weapon as a potential government shutdown loomed. At
the state level the Republicans have done more to save lives but the
national election is the subject at hand. I'd mention the Democratic
party but why bother?
Finally, the US Conference of Catholic
Bishops (USCCB) in their document 'Forming Consciences for FaithfulCitizenship' advises Catholic voters that abortion is a critical
issue but that it isn't the only issue that we should vote on.
Fair enough. Other issues loom large for me, including the
environment, government spying, maintaining a liberated internet,
government spending and debt, rational care for the poor, ISIS,
energy, the list goes on and on. And, despite my own feelings to the
contrary, every good political quiz I take puts me on the center-Left
despite my own pro-life and 'hawkish' attitudes of late. I don'tidentify with the Left, as anyone who reads my other blog will attest.
I most identify as a moderate and will likely cast a vote for a
candidate who makes me sick to my stomach in the fall. Given who I
expect to win the parties respective nominations I'd say contracting
voting-induced-stomach-flu is likely.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for reading!